image - a family of ducks at Pine Flat Lake

Public Notices

Under the Corps' Regulatory Program, a public notice is the primary method for advising all interested parties of a proposed activity for which a permit is sought. Soliciting comments and information necessary to evaluate the probable impacts on the public interest. Public notices are also published to inform the public about new or proposed regulations, policies, guidance or permit procedures.

Public Notices published by the Sacramento District under the Regulatory Program are posted on this page. Once a public notice is available on-line, an email notification is sent to individuals on the appropriate mailing list.

Comments are due by the expiration date of the public notice.  Only comments submitted by email or in hard copy format through a delivery service, such as the U.S. Postal Service, can be accepted.   Comments must be submitted to the address listed in the public notice.

Sign Up for Public Notices

Mailing lists are categorized by county and state. For instructions to be added to a Public Notice notification list, see

SPK 2015-00818, WRDA Proposal - Colorado Department of Transportation

Published Sept. 25, 2015
Expiration date: 10/12/2015

Sacramento District

Comments Period: 25 September to 12 October 2015 (15 Days)

SUBJECT: Proposal to accept funds from the Colorado Department of Transportation

This Public Notice announces the preliminary intent of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, Omaha District and Albuquerque District (Corps) to accept funds contributed by the Colorado Department of Transportation in order to expedite processing of their permit applications, subject to a series of limitations below.

Section 214 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (WRDA 2000, Public Law No. 106-541 111-120) as amended, provides:

(a) The Secretary of the Army, after public notice, may accept and expend funds contributed by non-Federal public entities to expedite the evaluation of permits under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army.
(b) In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall ensure that the use of funds accepted under subsection (a) will not impact impartial decision making with respect to permits, either substantively or procedurally.

The Secretary of the Army has delegated this responsibility to the Chief of Engineers and his authorized representatives, including the Commander of the Sacramento District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Definition of non-Federal public entities: Non-Federal public entities are comprised of state and local governmental agencies and tribal governments. The Colorado Department of Transportation meets this definition.

How the Corps would expend the funds: The Corps regulatory program is funded as a congressionally appropriated line item in the annual Federal budget. Additional funds received by the Colorado Department of Transportation would be used to augment the budget of the Corps in accordance with the provisions of Section 214 of WRDA 2000, as amended. The Corps would establish a separate account to track the receipt and expenditure of the funds.

Activities for which funds will be expended: Funds would be expended primarily on the labor and overhead of regulatory personnel processing permit applications by the Corps. Such permit processing activities could include, but not be limited to, the following: application completeness review, jurisdictional determinations, site visits, preparation of public notices, preparation of correspondence, meetings, consultation with other agencies, public interest review, distribution of public notices, analysis of alternatives, compensatory mitigation proposal reviews, preparation of environmental assessments, preparation of permit decision documents and permit compliance.

Procedures to be used to ensure impartial decision-making: To ensure the funds will not impact impartial decision-making, the following procedures would apply:

(a) All final permit decisions for cases where these funds are used must be reviewed at least one level above the decision maker, unless the decision maker is the District Commander. For example, if the decision maker is the Chief of the Regulatory Division, then the reviewer would be the District Commander.
(b) All final permit decisions for applications where these funds are expended will be made available on the Corps Headquarters web page.
(c) The Corps will not eliminate any procedures or decisions that would otherwise be required for that type of project and permit application under consideration.
(d) The Corps will comply with all applicable laws and regulations.
(e) Funds will only be expended to provide priority review of the participating non-Federal entity’s permit applications.

Impacts to the Regulatory Program: We do not expect priority review of Colorado Department of Transportation projects to negatively impact the regulatory program or to increase the time for permit evaluations of other projects since additional staff will be hired to augment this priority review.

Consideration of Comments: The Corps is soliciting comments from the public, Federal, State and local agencies and officials, and other interested parties. Comments will be made part of the record, and they will be considered in determining whether it would be in the public interest to proceed with this action. If the Sacramento District, Omaha District and Albuquerque District Commanders determines, after considering public comments, that the acceptance and expenditure of the funds is in compliance with Section 214 of WRDA 2000 as amended, the Corps will implement the act through a signed memorandum of agreement and accept funds from Colorado Department of Transportation. A second public notice will be issued regarding the final decision on this matter.

Submission of Comments: Comments on implementing Section 214 of WRDA 2000 as amended will be accepted and made part of the record, and they will be considered in determining whether it would be in the best public interest to proceed with this administrative practice. Interested parties may submit, in writing, any comments concerning this proposal. Comments should refer to SPK-2015-00818 and be forwarded by the comment due date of 12 October 2015. Comments must be sent to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, Regulatory Division, ATTN: Michael Nepstad, 1325 J Street, Room 1350, Sacramento, CA 95814-2922. Alternatively, comments can be sent electronically to