CESPK-RD-N
SUBJECT: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, (Corps) is evaluating a permit application to construct the Blue Oaks Boulevard and West Park Drive Improvement project, which would result in direct impacts to approximately 2.09 acres of waters of the United States, including wetlands, in or adjacent to Pleasant Grove Creek. This notice is to inform interested parties of the proposed activity and to solicit comments.
AUTHORITY: This application is being evaluated under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act for the discharge of fill material in waters of the United States.
APPLICANT: Chris Kraft, City of Roseville Public Works Department, 311 Vernon Street
Roseville, California 95661-2649
LOCATION: The site is located near Pleasant Grove Creek in Sections 14 and 28, Township 11 North, Range 5 East, Mount Diablo Baseline and Meridian, Latitude 38.7950°, Longitude -121.3843°, Roseville, Placer County, California, and can be seen on the CA-PLEASANT GROVE USGS Topographic Quadrangle.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to extend Blue Oaks Boulevard westward for 2,700 feet as a six-lane arterial and to construct 1,200 feet of West Park Drive as a two-lane north-south connector road between the extended Blue Oaks Boulevard and the existing Phillip Road to the south. A bridge would be installed over an unnamed tributary of Pleasant Grove Creek. Based on the available information, the overall project purpose is to provide transportation infrastructure. The applicant believes the project is needed to provide the City of Roseville’s adopted transportation level-of-service based on build-out of existing, approved and entitled lands within the City and projected 2025 market-rate development outside the City. The attached drawings provide additional project details.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Environmental Setting. There are approximately 6.85 acres of waters of the U.S within the project area. This includes 0.09 acres of intermittent and perennial stream, 4.85 acres of vernal pools and swales, 0.10 acre of seasonal marsh, and 1.81 acres of other seasonal wetland habitats. The site is characterized by the Pleasant Grove Creek corridor and vernal pool grassland habitat.
Alternatives. The applicant has provided information concerning project alternatives, such as using different alignments or constructing an elevated roadway. Additional information concerning project alternatives may be available from the applicant or their agent. Other alternatives may develop during the review process for this permit application. All reasonable project alternatives, in particular those which may be less damaging to the aquatic environment, will be considered.
Mitigation. The Corps requires that applicants consider and use all reasonable and practical measures to avoid and minimize impacts to aquatic resources. If the applicant is unable to avoid or minimize all impacts, the Corps will require compensatory mitigation. The applicant proposes to mitigate directly impacted waters of the U.S. by purchasing in-kind constructed wetland credits from a Corps-approved bank at a 1:1 ratio. The applicant proposes to mitigate indirectly impacted waters of the U.S. similarly, but at a 0.5:1 ratio.
OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORIZATIONS: Water quality certification or a waiver, as required under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board is required for this project. The applicant has not indicated they have applied for certification.
HISTORIC PROPERTIES: The Corps will initiate consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as appropriate.
ENDANGERED SPECIES: The proposed activity may affect Federally-listed endangered or threatened species or their critical habitat. The Corps will initiate consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service, pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, as appropriate.
ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT: The proposed project will not adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) as defined in the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.
The above determinations are based on information provided by the applicant and our preliminary review.
EVALUATION FACTORS: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the described activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the described activity, must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the described activity will be considered, including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, consideration of property ownership and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. The activity's impact on the public interest will include application of the Section 404(b)(1) guidelines promulgated by the Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency (40 CFR Part 230).
The Corps is soliciting comments from the public, Federal, State, and local agencies and officials, Indian tribes, and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
SUBMITTING COMMENTS: Written comments, referencing Public Notice SPK-2013-00206 must be submitted to the office listed below on or before April 3, 2013.
William Ness, Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District
1325 J Street, Room 1350
Sacramento, California 95814-2922
Email: William.W.Ness@usace.army.mil
The Corps is particularly interested in receiving comments related to the proposal's probable impacts on the affected aquatic environment and the secondary and cumulative effects. Anyone may request, in writing, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests shall specifically state, with particularity, the reason(s) for holding a public hearing. If the Corps determines that the information received in response to this notice is inadequate for thorough evaluation, a public hearing may be warranted. If a public hearing is warranted, interested parties will be notified of the time, date, and location. Please note that all comment letters received are subject to release to the public through the Freedom of Information Act. If you have questions or need additional information please contact the applicant or the Corps' project manager William Ness, 916-557-5268, William.W.Ness@usace.army.mil.
Attachments: 5 drawings